A Series on Sustainable Planet, People + Prosperity

 

Recent photos from the mainland China city of Harbin show visibility reduced to 10 meters because of air pollution. The airport and schools had to be closed.  The images make Mordor look good and Hong Kong air seem almost pristine by comparison. The vice director of China’s Environmental Protection Agency stated “The heavy pollution of Harbin is due to weather conditions”.

IMG_0983The San Gabriel Mountains often were invisible when I lived in Los Angeles in the late 80’s. “That’s not necessarily pollution,” a California friend told me. “Sometimes it’s ocean fog and humidity.”  Hmmm. She came from San Francisco and it might be true for that city. But for most parts of greater LA like Ontario in the eastern half of the megalopolis, 45 miles (72 km) from the ocean and only 4 miles (6.5 km) from the mountains, it’s hard to believe that fog was the culprit when the range couldn’t be seen. I’ve read and hope that the air in LA is better now.

Before coming to Hong Kong I’d heard that its air quality is poor. Nevertheless when I arrived and had trouble seeing the wind turbine on Lamma or even the island itself 3 km (2 miles) away from our apartment windows I gave air quality the benefit of the doubt. The 80% humidity typical at that time of year was definitely higher than Tucson’s usual 35%. That coupled with ocean effects (which keep Hong Kong’s day and night temperatures within about a 5°C (9°F) range) could create atmospheric conditions leading to decreased visibility.

But now I’ve been here almost two months and autumn has begun. Humidity has noticeably decreased. Our dehumidifier water storage tank is taking far longer to fill and the relative humidity was only 42% this morning. But still the air isn’t clear by Tucson standards and I can’t remember even part of a day when it has been. Tucson’s air visibility is very good and by that measure Hong Kong can’t help but fall short.

IMG_0985To give some perspective, Reuters reports that during its recent pollution spike Harbin’s air pollution reading for PM2.5 (fine suspended particles) was around 1,000 and last winter Beijing’s peaked at greater than 900. Hong Kong’s, Los Angeles’s, and Tucson’s 2012 24-hour average maximums were 210, 58.7, and 27.7 respectively.

On the other hand with respect to monitoring, informing the public about, and making efforts to improve air quality there things Tucson can learn from Hong Kong. The Hong Kong government publishes data from 14 monitoring sites which each report five to six categories of air pollutants hourly on the web in near real time and it has done this for a number of years. This becomes more impressive in the context of China’s nondisclosure of detailed air pollution data prior to 2012. Tucson’s monitoring is far less for approximately the same metropolitan land area. Tucson (Pima County) collects a full spectrum of pollution data at only one site. And although it has 13 additional sites only two measure more than one or two pollutants.

However what Hong Kong considers as acceptable air is more polluted than what is considered acceptable by Tucson, which follows U.S. EPA standards. New HK Air Quality Objectives proposed for adoption in 2014 will improve that. But neither Hong Kong’s proposed standards nor Tucson’s meet World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines. Here’s a comparison.

Acceptable Air Standards

Although its air quality objectives are less healthy than Tucson’s, Hong Kong has significantly improved its air over the past 15 years. Following comprehensive vehicle emission control measures announced in 1999, levels of particulates, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides decreased 34%, 60%, and 30% respectively by 2010. In the past few years a variety of carrot and stick measures have been adopted to further decrease vehicle emissions. These include grants to encourage owners of older cars to replace them with less polluting vehicles and a law requiring drivers to turn off engines while vehicles are stationary.

IMG_0208Additional measures planned for implementation include expansion of Hong Kong’s heavily used rail network (I’m eagerly awaiting the already-under-construction MTR extension to the University of Hong Kong and Kennedy Town), rationalization of bus routes, the establishment of zones limited to pedestrians or low emission vehicles, and the adoption of mandatory building energy codes.

Electricity generation is the largest single source of pollution in Hong Kong. To encourage HK’s two government regulated privately-owned coal-dependent power companies to invest in renewable energy, a higher profit is allowed on such investment and the companies’ overall rate of return is linked to performance in meeting emission caps. Unfortunately non-utility solar photovoltaic systems seem to be almost, but not quite, nonexistent here and there appears to be little interest in them. I’m working on figuring out the reason for that.

 

Side Notes: PM 2.5 are particles suspended in air that are less than 2.5 microns in diameter. They are caused by combustion from sources such as vehicles, ships, power plants, and trash incineration and are harmful to health.

After deducting parkland, which is 40% of Hong Kong’s total land area, the remaining metropolitan area of about 255 (660 km2) square miles is essentially the same as the City of Tucson’s 227 square miles (588 km2) and far less than Pima County’s 9,189 square miles (23,799 km2).

In addition to pollution data the Air portion of the Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department web site http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environmentinhk/air/air_maincontent.html contains a wealth of information about current and proposed air quality policies, objectives, and strategies. Information about HK’s past air quality improvement is from this site. Tucson’s comparable website is http://www.deq.pima.gov/air/index.html.

 

 

Dante Archangeli recently moved to Hong Kong from Tucson, Arizona, USA, where he focused on sustainable construction and development.  He is an MIT and USC educated project manager, entrepreneur, and builder.

Smog in Hong Kong photo in header courtesy Shutterstock. All other photos by Dante Archangeli.

Print Friendly

11 Responses

  1. Douglas Pulleyblank

    Interesting. I had never looked to see what sort of monitoring goes on in Vancouver. Here’s what a quick search came up with: http://www.bcairquality.ca/readings/. There is fairly detailed information about what’s happening in the lower mainland of Vancouver.

  2. Dante Archangeli

    Hi Doug. Thanks for your comment. I’m glad the post got you thinking. It looks to me like BC does a lot of monitoring. You can click on an area of the map to get more detailed info about specific localities.

    The closest monitoring station to your home is Kitsilano (and there are lots of others in Vancouver). The most recent reading for PM2.5 was 11.3 micrograms / cubic meter. The 24 hour rolling average was 12.8. That’s pretty good air. Hong Kong’s most recent data at their Central West station, the one that is probably closest to my home is 45.8.

    Hmmm. Kitsilano is part of a major metropolitan area on a peninsula surrounded by ocean. Except for the air quality (and being next door to China!) sounds pretty similar to Hong Kong.

    Like most localities the summary information that the site gives is an “index” number that is proprietary from place to place. But if you drill down to the actual data, that is provided in the international standard units of micrograms / meter cubed.

    • Ross Sheard

      I love the blog. Amazing to see the data comparisons. For me ocean tides and waves are a wonder. You being on the other side of planet Earth communicating with me at my desk is just plain awesome. Your blog makes the world smaller and universal for me.

  3. Scott Neeley

    Great blog.
    Fascinating observations about how we perceive pollution vs. “weather conditions”. In Midtown Tucson I monitor air quality by how clear the Catalinas are; I’m sure that humidity, angle of the sun, etc. as well as pollution, etc. factor into that clarity. Best after a rain washes the air clean.
    Also useful to see data about EPA vs. WHO standards, and realize the distance we have to go.

    • Dante Archangeli

      Thanks for the comments Scott. For the last week or so I’ve been keeping track of how visible the Lamma wind turbine is at about the same time each day and nearby PM2.5 readings at about the same time. After there is more data I’ll let you know how well they correlate.

  4. Jeni

    I remember HK air being different from Tucson, but didn’t realize HOW different until I read these figures you provided. Looking forward to seeing what you can find out about the solar photovoltaic systems.

  5. Lam Yuk Ling

    In the summer time the south west monsoon wind clears up the sky of HK and blue sky appears more often. Linda hosted a hike from Central to Mount Davis on 17.6.2013 and captured photos showing beautiful blue sky with billowing clouds. They are much different from dull, hazy photos posted here. Please check when you have time and you may find sweating, hot hikes in the summer are worth. I am so used to the quality of air here and cannot tell any difference.
    It is interesting to learn the statistics.

  6. Jessa

    Ayacucho Peru’s results just released:
    Primary cause of pollution is the 830 buses, 1998 cars and 2,222 mototaxis, causing 53.12% of the pollution particularly when driving on dirt roads.
    In 2009 the pollutants were between 108g/m3 and 149 /m3 per day (except on one day of the study when one point that was measured reached 150 g/m3 which is above the standard)
    In rainy season, April 2012 the pollutants reached 150g/m3.
    Yuck! I should move to Tucson.

  7. Jessa

    Ugh, just looked up Lima’s and in 2006 was 166.57 micrograms per cubic meter – pretty bad.
    But I guess HK still takes the pollutant cake…

    • Dante Archangeli

      Thanks for the comments Jessa. Regarding the PM pollution in Ayacucho caused by vehicles it would be interesting to know how much is caused by exhaust and how much is from dust from dirt roads.

      Yep Tucson’s air is far better. LA’s is better too. But Beijing’s is far worse, so don’t move there.

      I’m not sure how Lima’s measurement of 166 ug/cubic meter compares to Hong Kong’s air. It depends on whether that is the annual or 24 hour average. In 2012 for PM10 HK’s highest annual average was 61 in Causeway Bay on Hong Kong Island.

  8. kona coffee

    I don’t even understand how I stopped up right here, but I thought this
    put up was good. I do not realize who you are but definitely
    you are going to a well-known blogger if you aren’t already.
    Cheers!

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons